● AI-Powered Security Intelligence

Centralized Visibility, Risk Auditing and Asset Inventory Across All Customers.

Keep your customers' device fleet modern, lower their risks and increase your value. Scan or automatically upload a customer's device inventory and get a complete, professionally written security analysis in seconds — covering cybersecurity exposure, investigative capability, operational risk, and perimeter protection.

▶ Start Using It Today See What's in the Report
Security Analyzer
Executive Summary

Every Report Starts With The Full Picture

Before a single finding is presented, every report opens with an Executive Summary — a plain-language overview of the site's entire device fleet with a risk rating across all four vulnerability categories.

Sample Executive Summary — Arrowhead School
90 devices · 86 cameras · 11 manufacturers

This review evaluates 90 security devices (86 cameras, 0 intercoms) across 11 manufacturers at Arrowhead School. Findings are grouped into four vulnerability categories and rated against thresholds defined for this engagement. Risk ratings are deterministic: every figure in this report can be re-derived from the accompanying device inventory.

🔐 Cybersecurity VulnerabilitiesHigh Risk
🔍 Investigative VulnerabilitiesHigh Risk
⚙️ Performance & OperationalLow Risk
🛡️ Perimeter ProtectionHigh Risk
Individual Category Results

Every Finding. Specific Numbers. No Guesswork.

Each report breaks down findings by category with exact device counts, percentages, a plain-language explanation, and a clear risk rating — followed by specific mitigation recommendations. Nothing is estimated. Every number comes directly from the uploaded inventory.

🔐
Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities
Evaluates the cyber risk introduced by the devices themselves — EOL exposure, unmanaged hardware, and firmware management gaps.
End-of-Life Devices
High Risk
11 of 90 devices are end-of-life (12.2%)
End-of-life devices represent the highest-priority replacement targets in any security audit. Once a manufacturer ends support, no further firmware updates, security patches, or vulnerability disclosures are issued — leaving the device permanently exposed to known exploits on the network.
  • Threshold: Any EOL device count above zero warrants identification. Sites above 10% EOL penetration are rated High Risk.
  • Fleet Impact: 11 devices are operating without manufacturer support. Each one represents a fixed, unmitigatable vulnerability for as long as it remains deployed.
  • Compliance Risk: EOL hardware is routinely flagged during cyber insurance audits and may void coverage or trigger premium increases.
Mitigation Recommendations

All end-of-life devices are identified by name in the accompanying inventory. Prioritize replacement in the following order:

  • Network-connected EOL cameras with internet-facing exposure first
  • EOL devices on shared network segments second
  • Air-gapped or offline EOL devices last
Firmware Management Risk
Medium Risk
81 of 90 devices (90%) fall outside centralized device management
Devices not enrolled in a centralized management platform cannot be monitored for firmware version, receive automated updates, or be audited for credential hygiene. At scale, unmanaged devices accumulate configuration drift and represent an expanding attack surface over time.
  • Scope: 81 devices are operating outside any centralized management console — meaning firmware versions are unknown and no automated patching workflow is in place.
  • Credential Risk: Unmanaged devices are more likely to retain factory-default credentials, which remain among the most common entry points in camera network intrusions.
  • Audit Gap: Without centralized management, there is no reliable mechanism to confirm which devices have received security updates or when.
Mitigation Recommendations
  • Enroll all unmanaged devices in the primary VMS or a dedicated device management platform
  • Establish a quarterly firmware review cycle for all enrolled devices
  • Audit credentials on all unmanaged devices and enforce a password rotation policy
Unmanaged Third-Party Hardware
Medium Risk
Multiple manufacturers outside primary management platform identified
A fragmented device fleet — hardware sourced from multiple vendors operating on separate management platforms — introduces network segmentation gaps and increases the likelihood that some devices are operating without any active management oversight.
  • Network Exposure: Third-party devices outside the primary management platform should not share network segments with corporate infrastructure unless explicitly enrolled in a network access control policy.
  • Management Blind Spots: Devices from secondary vendors are often not included in routine audits, firmware reviews, or credential rotation cycles.
Mitigation Recommendations
  • Segment all third-party devices onto a dedicated VLAN isolated from corporate network infrastructure
  • Enroll unmanaged third-party hardware in a network access control policy
  • Evaluate consolidation to reduce manufacturer count at next refresh cycle
🔍
Investigative Vulnerabilities
Evaluates whether the site can actually support an investigation — the realistic likelihood that recorded video will yield identifications after an incident.
Daytime Resolution
Medium Risk
44 of 86 cameras (51.2%) are 3MP or below
Daytime resolution directly determines the maximum distance at which an investigator can derive identifiable detail from recorded footage. Below 3MP, meaningful identification becomes unreliable at any distance beyond close range — limiting post-incident value regardless of how many cameras are deployed.
  • Identification Threshold: At standard field-of-view angles, sub-3MP cameras cannot reliably capture facial or license plate detail beyond 15–20 feet.
  • Fleet Penetration: 51.2% of cameras fall below the minimum threshold for reliable investigative use, meaning more than half of this site's recorded footage has limited evidentiary value at distance.
  • Upgrade Priority: Cameras covering entry points, parking areas, and perimeter positions should be prioritized for resolution upgrades.
Mitigation Recommendations
  • Prioritize resolution upgrades for cameras at exterior entry points and parking areas first
  • Target a minimum of 5MP for any camera covering an area where identification may be required
  • Consider multi-sensor panoramic cameras for large open areas to improve resolution coverage without adding device count
Nighttime Imaging Quality
High Risk
Only 3 of 86 cameras (3.5%) use OptimizedIR — 96.5% rely on standard IR during after-hours conditions
Nighttime imaging quality is one of the most commonly overlooked investigative gaps in camera deployments. Standard IR illumination produces flat, washed-out images at close range and insufficient illumination at distance — significantly reducing the usability of after-hours footage for investigative purposes.
  • OptimizedIR: Cameras with OptimizedIR automatically adjust illumination intensity and beam width as objects move closer, preventing overexposure at close range while maintaining useful illumination at distance.
  • After-Hours Exposure: 83 cameras are producing suboptimal nighttime imagery, meaning the majority of incidents occurring after dark will be captured with limited investigative utility.
  • Incident Timing: The majority of security incidents requiring investigation occur during low-light or no-light conditions — making nighttime imaging capability a primary determinant of post-incident outcomes.
Mitigation Recommendations

Nighttime imaging upgrades should be prioritized at exterior and after-hours access points:

  • Replace standard-IR cameras at all exterior entry points with OptimizedIR-capable models
  • Evaluate supplemental lighting for areas where camera replacement is not immediately feasible
  • Confirm IR range specifications match the actual detection distances required for each camera position
AI Analytics Coverage
Medium Risk
35 of 86 cameras (40.7%) have onboard AI analytics
Cameras with onboard AI analytics can alert on specific events — loitering, line crossing, object left behind, crowd density — without requiring manual video review. Sites with low AI analytics penetration rely entirely on staff to review footage reactively, eliminating the possibility of proactive detection.
  • Proactive vs. Reactive: Without analytics, the security system functions purely as a recording archive. Incidents must be discovered by staff or witnesses before investigation can begin.
  • Coverage Gap: 51 cameras (59.3%) have no onboard analytics capability. Incidents in areas covered only by non-analytics cameras will not generate automated alerts.
  • Search Efficiency: Cameras with AI metadata allow investigators to search footage by event type rather than scrubbing through hours of recording — a critical capability after any incident.
Mitigation Recommendations
  • Prioritize analytics-capable cameras at high-value monitoring positions: entry points, loading areas, parking facilities
  • Evaluate server-side analytics platforms that can extend detection capability to cameras without onboard AI
  • Define specific alert rules for each analytics-capable camera to ensure events are actioned, not just recorded
⚙️
Performance & Operational
Evaluates day-to-day operational risk — inventory footprint, hardware diversity, and management complexity of a fragmented device fleet.
Inventory Footprint & Manufacturer Diversity
Low Risk
90 total devices across 11 distinct manufacturers
Manufacturer count is a direct proxy for operational complexity. Each additional manufacturer in a fleet introduces a separate management console, firmware update cadence, support contract, and technician training requirement. High manufacturer counts translate into a larger operational burden and higher long-term support costs.
  • Fleet Size: 90 devices is within the manageable range for a site of this type. The device count itself does not represent a risk factor.
  • Manufacturer Diversity: 11 manufacturers is elevated for a site of this footprint. The full manufacturer mix — Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Geovision, Hanwha, Hikvision, LTS Security, Pelco, Vivotek — is documented in the accompanying inventory.
  • Consolidation Opportunity: Each refresh cycle is an opportunity to consolidate the fleet around a primary manufacturer, reducing long-term support overhead.
Mitigation Recommendations
  • Identify a primary manufacturer standard for future camera purchases
  • Prioritize EOL and lowest-performing cameras from secondary manufacturers as first replacement targets
  • Target a manufacturer count below 4 at next full refresh cycle
🛡️
Perimeter Protection
Evaluates outer-ring detection, visitor vetting, and vehicle control posture — the layers responsible for surfacing threats before they reach the interior.
License Plate Recognition
High Risk
Only 1 LPR-capable camera deployed across the entire site
License plate recognition is a foundational capability for vehicle-of-interest workflows. Without LPR, investigators cannot search recorded footage by plate number, cannot verify vehicle access after an incident, and cannot support any post-incident traceback involving a vehicle. A single LPR camera covering one access point leaves all other vehicle ingress and egress points unmonitored for plate data.
  • Investigative Dependency: Every vehicle-related incident — theft, trespass, hit-and-run — requires plate data for investigation. Without LPR, investigators rely on manual review of standard camera footage, which rarely yields usable plate images.
  • Coverage Gap: One LPR camera at a site with multiple vehicular entry and exit points leaves the majority of vehicle traffic outside any plate-capture workflow.
  • Threshold: A minimum of one LPR-capable camera per vehicular ingress and egress point is recommended. Sites with a single primary entrance require a minimum of two LPR cameras (entry and exit).
Mitigation Recommendations
  • Deploy LPR-capable cameras at every vehicular entry and exit point
  • Ensure LPR cameras are positioned to capture plates at the correct angle and distance for reliable read rates (typically 0–30° horizontal, 0–20° vertical offset from lane center)
  • Integrate LPR data with VMS for searchable plate records linked to video timestamps
Visitor Control & Vetting
High Risk
0 intercom devices deployed — no electronic visitor vetting at any entry point
Intercom systems are the primary mechanism for controlled visitor vetting at entry points. Without intercom coverage, all visitor identification and access decisions fall entirely on staff — creating a significant security gap at high-risk entry points such as main building entries, loading docks, and after-hours access doors.
  • Staff Dependency: At sites with no intercom infrastructure, visitor vetting is entirely reliant on staff availability and judgment. Gaps in staffing translate directly into uncontrolled entry.
  • School Site Risk: For school facilities, controlled visitor access is typically a baseline safety requirement. The absence of any electronic vetting mechanism represents a significant gap relative to site type.
  • Audit and Accountability: Intercom systems with video capture create an auditable record of every entry attempt. Without intercom, no record exists of who was granted access or denied at controlled entry points.
Mitigation Recommendations
  • Deploy intercom at every controlled exterior entry — main building entry, secondary doors, loading dock, and after-hours access points
  • Select intercom units with integrated video and access control relay support to unify vetting, recording, and door control in a single system
  • Integrate intercom with VMS so visitor interactions are recorded and timestamped alongside camera footage
Radar Detection
Medium Risk
0 radar-capable cameras deployed
Radar-based detection extends perimeter awareness beyond the optical limits of standard cameras. Radar can detect motion in complete darkness, through rain or fog, and at distances that exceed the reliable range of standard IR illumination — providing an outer detection ring that cameras alone cannot replicate.
  • Detection Gap: The current perimeter relies entirely on optical cameras for exterior detection. In low-light, adverse weather, or at distances beyond IR range, the perimeter is effectively unmonitored.
  • Recommended Threshold: A minimum of five radar-capable assets is recommended for any site with an exterior perimeter requiring active monitoring.
  • Integration Value: Radar-camera integration allows radar detections to automatically trigger PTZ positioning and recording, eliminating the need for staff to monitor live feeds continuously.
Mitigation Recommendations
  • Deploy a minimum of five radar-capable perimeter cameras covering all exterior zones
  • Integrate radar detections with PTZ cameras for automated tracking and recording triggers
  • Map radar coverage zones against camera fields of view to eliminate detection gaps at perimeter boundaries
Exterior Blind-Spot Coverage
Low Risk
13 multi-sensor / panoramic cameras deployed — appropriate coverage for this site footprint
Multi-sensor and panoramic cameras are the most effective tool for eliminating exterior blind spots. Each unit covers a wide field of view with multiple independent sensors, providing complete situational awareness in open areas without the coverage gaps inherent in single-sensor camera placements.
  • Coverage Adequacy: 13 panoramic units is appropriate for a site of this footprint. Blind-spot coverage does not represent a current risk factor.
  • Documentation Value: Multi-sensor cameras provide a complete visual record of large areas from a single device — simplifying both real-time monitoring and post-incident review.
Mitigation Recommendations
  • Maintain current panoramic deployment as devices reach end-of-life — replace with equivalent or higher-specification multi-sensor units
  • Confirm panoramic camera placement covers all exterior transition zones between monitored areas
Recommended Actions

Every Finding Comes With A Clear Next Step

The report does not just identify problems — it tells your customer exactly what to do about each one, giving your team a ready-made scope of work to turn into a proposal on the spot.

01
Replace

Schedule EOL Device Replacement

Every end-of-life device is identified by name. The report flags them as highest-priority replacement targets and provides the justification. Your proposal writes itself.

02
Upgrade

Modernize Low-Resolution & IR-Deficient Cameras

Sub-3MP cameras and cameras without OptimizedIR are flagged with specific counts and percentages — a prioritized replacement list tied directly to security outcomes.

03
Upgrade

Deploy LPR at Every Vehicular Ingress

Sites with zero or minimal LPR coverage are flagged High Risk. The report recommends LPR at every vehicular ingress — a clear, scopable upgrade.

04
Policy

Enroll Third-Party Devices in Network Policy

Unmanaged devices are recommended for enrollment in a network access control policy and segmentation from corporate VLANs — a recurring managed service opportunity.

05
Upgrade

Add Intercom at Every Controlled Entry

Sites with no intercom coverage receive a High Risk rating and a specific recommendation: intercom at every controlled exterior entry plus loading-dock and after-hours doors.

06
Upgrade

Deploy Radar for Perimeter Detection

Sites with no radar coverage are given a specific threshold: minimum five radar-capable assets for any site with an exterior perimeter.

What You Get Beyond the Report

A Platform Built Around Long-Term Customer Value

The Security Analyzer is not just a report tool — it is a platform for keeping your customers' security device fleets current, secure, and documented.

📋

Fleet Health

Every scan identifies EOL devices, outdated firmware risk, and non-compliant hardware before your customer knows they have a problem. Run a scan at every annual review and walk in with a current health report.

🛡️

Modern Technology

The report flags every device that is no longer fit for purpose — cameras too low-resolution to support an investigation, devices past end-of-life, hardware that falls outside any management workflow.

🗄️

Archived Inventory

Every scan is automatically stored — the full device inventory, the PDF report, and the raw data — tagged to the customer site and accessible from your Intelligence Dashboard at any time.

📊

Professional Reporting

Every scan produces a professionally formatted PDF consultant report your team can present directly to a customer, facility manager, or school board. No manual formatting. Ready to hand over the moment the scan completes.

📈

Trending Over Time

Every scan is stored against the customer site. Run a second scan after a partial upgrade and instantly see how the risk profile changed. Your Intelligence Dashboard tracks follow-up status, budgeting conversations, and estimated upgrade value across your entire book of business.

💰

Revenue Opportunities

EOL devices need replacement. Low-resolution cameras need upgrading. Zero LPR coverage needs addressing. Every one of those is a scoped, justified upgrade conversation — and the report hands you the justification in writing.

Pricing

Simple Plans, No Surprises

All plans include the full Security Analyzer, Intelligence Dashboard, archived reports and inventories, PDF exports, team member invites, and secure cloud storage.

1K Plan
$295/mo
1,000 device scans per month
  • Full 4-Category Risk Reports (PDF)
  • Executive Summary per scan
  • Individual findings with risk ratings
  • Recommended actions per finding
  • Excel Device Inventory Export
  • Archived scans & inventories
  • Intelligence Dashboard
  • Project Scan Link System
  • Team Member Invites
Get Started
* Requires a 12-month subscription, billed monthly.
Most Popular
2.5K Plan
$595/mo
2,500 device scans per month
  • Full 4-Category Risk Reports (PDF)
  • Executive Summary per scan
  • Individual findings with risk ratings
  • Recommended actions per finding
  • Excel Device Inventory Export
  • Archived scans & inventories
  • Intelligence Dashboard
  • Project Scan Link System
  • Team Member Invites
Get Started
* Requires a 12-month subscription, billed monthly.
5K Plan
$795/mo
5,000 device scans per month
  • Full 4-Category Risk Reports (PDF)
  • Executive Summary per scan
  • Individual findings with risk ratings
  • Recommended actions per finding
  • Excel Device Inventory Export
  • Archived scans & inventories
  • Intelligence Dashboard
  • Project Scan Link System
  • Team Member Invites
Get Started
* Requires a 12-month subscription, billed monthly.

Need a custom arrangement? Let's talk

What Customers Say

Built for Security Integrators & Consultants

★★★★★
"We scanned a 90-device school site and had a complete risk report in under 20 seconds. That report turned into three separate upgrade proposals in the same week."
MR
Mike R.
VP Sales, Regional Security Integrator
★★★★★
"The archived inventory is something we did not know we needed until we had it. A customer called asking what cameras they had at a specific building — we pulled up the scan from six months ago and had the full answer in 30 seconds."
JT
Jennifer T.
Director of Operations, Security Consulting Firm
★★★★★
"The recommended actions in the report are what close the deal. Customers stop asking if they need to upgrade and start asking when."
DS
David S.
Owner, Commercial Security Solutions

Your Customers Have Outdated Devices Right Now.

They just don't know it yet. Every site has EOL devices, coverage gaps, and upgrade opportunities waiting to be found. The Security Analyzer finds them automatically, in seconds, with a professional report your customer can act on today.

▶ Sign Up & Start Today